And going off on a tangent here, it has lead to different data issues. The convenience of digital means we have thousands upon thousands of photos. And while we have a hierarchy of directories by date it's still a great mass of unwieldy data. So in the end, each photo is ephemeral - for a few months we remember it, look at it occasionally, but after that it's hard to find. I remember when I was a kid whenever Dad finished a film in the camera it'd go off and get processed, then he'd bring the photos home and we'd spread them out on the dining table (all 36 of them, if it was after a holiday or somewhere when he'd taken more than a film's worth we'd do them a film at a time). Then we'd pick out the best 4 or 5, maybe more if there were several events recorded, and they'd go in the album. Labelled up with date & occasion. And I'd look through the albums every so often, it was a much more permanent record. We'd send a little album every year to my grandparents, too - sometimes the pictures for that would be done photoshoot style with a few changes of outfit (so there're pics of me in my guide uniform or Dave in his scout one, or me in my ballet stuff from way way back when I did that (briefly) all in front of the dark red velvet curtain in the dining room). And a selection of snaps from through the year. After Grandma and Grandad died (3 years ago now) J & I had a box or two full of their photo albums in the house for a few months (car space issues for my parents getting stuff back from Scotland meant we took them). And it was great going through them all - not just the old stuff from when they were young, and my Dad & his brothers were kids or young men but also all the little albums we'd sent them over the years. (And as a teenager (when I had my hair short) I didn't half look like my Dad did when he was a teen - moving between the two sets of photos it was striking).
I kinda want to do albums for us - not necessarily physical ones, although the article that sparked this train of thought (this time) makes me think printed photos might be a good idea too. It's such a daunting prospect though. We have so many photographs. I think we got our first digital camera in 2001 - our first pictures on the fileserver are Christmas Day 2001 (which looks in some ways very similar to Christmas Day 2009, compare here and here). So that's 8 full years of photos, plus a few days of 2001 and a few months of 2010. And that includes our Egypt trip where I know we took approximately 2000 photos, and have another 1500 or so from Derrick & Christine's cameras. The Egypt trip is the place I have to start though - because I've got that half-finished website about the trip already. (Progress report on that - I've typed up and edited all my diary, and I've typed up 2 days of J's diary for him to edit. So 10 days of diary typing, plus choosing and organising the photos.)
Of course the Egypt trip stuff is a different project really - it has the diaries, and is a self-contained finite event. For the bulk of the photos there are two different "problems". First is data organisation - yes, we have our dated directories, but we have no further organisation than that. I can't pull out "photos of me" or "photos in Oxford" or anything at all. So they need tagged. A daunting prospect in itself (how many thousand pictures??) but made more difficult because I haven't liked any of the existing solutions I've tried. For three different reasons, two philosophical and one practical. 1) I don't want to get tied into using someone's program forever, when it may or may not continue to exist in a form I like or even can use. 2) I don't want it to alter my photos to add the tags in or copy the photos to add the tags into a copy. 3) The ones I've tried have felt clunky to use if you're retrospectively tagging a large set of photos. And we want to do it in linux as that's our day-to-day OS which counts out some options from the start. So we're likely to end up wanting to write our own (me do the bulk of writing it, I guess, J's not got the time on his hands); which just adds another layer to the already daunting task. (In essence it would be a script or collection of scripts that read a text file in each directory which contained filenames and associated tags and piped the list of "photos of subject[s] X [and others] [between dates A & B]" into the photo viewer in gnome or similar.)
The second "problem" is that once you've organised the data, and can find things in it, how many and which photos do you choose? For the Egypt trip project I've arbitarily decided that I should end up with about 10% of the total pictures. Spread over 12 different day-pages 350ish photos sounds like an amount people might want to look at. Of course, I've not done it yet, so I don't know how that'll work out. Once I've done that I can probably use it to formulate a rule of thumb for other interesting events, but with the random pictures of the cat, or the garden etc, it's harder. And then if I were to do physical albums too I'd want to cut it down even further I think - the cost of printing (and placing in albums) even 10% of our photos would likely be prohibitive.
But it'll be a while before any such project could get that far - first order of business needs to be the Egypt trip photos/website. Next, tagging (if anyone has programs they love for this purpose that run on linux do suggest them, there may be one I've missed after all :) ). Then worry about albums.